Slownomic

Rules

Rule 0: This is Slownomic. A motto of some sort should replace this sentence.

Rule 1: Any person can become a player by adding their name to the 'Players' section of the game. Any person can make themselves cease to be a player by removing their name from that section.

Rule 2: Any person can make a Proposal in the Proposals section. If it has more FOR votes than AGAINST votes after 30 days have passed (720 hours), then any player can apply the Proposal's effects, then delete the Proposal. A Proposal's author can delete their own Proposal at any time.

Rule 3: Players have only one vote on Proposals, which is FOR, AGAINST or PRESENT. Players can edit their vote at any time. A player votes by clearly noting who they are and what they are voting in a reasonable space under the Proposal.

Players

• nix, the unbreakable
• Trigon, the polygonal
• Silent G
• Jason, the Bourne
• ATMunn, the friendly
• Wotton, the paradoxical

Proposals

Funbucks

Title: Funbucks
Author: nix
Effects:

{ Enact a new rule titled "Merit Badges" with the following text:

 When a player has every rule-defined merit badge, they should feel good about themselves and other players should praise their hard work and effort.

 - If a player has ever written a proposal that passed, then they have the Penmanship merit badge.

}

Votes:

• nix: FOR
• Trigon: FOR
• G: FOR
• Jason: FOR
• ATMunn: FOR
• Wotton: FOR

Mottoation

Title: Mottoation
Author: G

{

In Rule 0, Replace "A motto of some sort should replace this sentence." with "Motto:"

Enact a Rule, "What's the Motto", with this text:

   A player can add or remove one character from the motto in Rule 0, provided e has not done so in the past 7 days.

}

Votes:

• G: FOR
• Jason: FOR
• ATMunn: FOR
• Trigon: FOR
• nix: FOR
• Wotton: FOR

Rapid De-Escalation

Title: Rapid De-Escalation
Author: nix

Desc: We must move with extreme speed in order to prevent conflict, therefore I propose a swift judicial system.

{

Any person may write a Statement in the De-Escalation section. Any person may vote TRUE or FALSE, and edit their vote at any time, on any Statement. After 15 days, a Statement is either TRUE or FALSE, whichever has more votes, as long as it does not contradict the rules.

}

Votes:

• G: AGAINST. This judgement system adds a platonic "as long as it does not contradict the rules" for success/failure. But that's an infinite regress if the statement is about what is or isn't against the rules.
• Jason: AGAINST
• ATMunn: AGAINST, this doesn't say to add a new rule
• Wotton: AGAINST, general concerns over paradox-forcing
• Trigon: AGAINST, since I'm an absolute lemming

The Tower of Babel

Title: The Tower of Babel

Author: Wotton

Effects: {Enact a new rule titled "The Tower of Babel" with the following text:

   There is a game entity known as "The Tower of Babel". Initially, its height is 0 meters. Each time a Proposal has its effects applied and is deleted, its height increases by one meter. When and only when the height of The Tower of Babel is a prime number of meters, the following rules apply:
   ==== Babel Rule I ====
   A player can add and/or remove up to two characters from the motto in Rule 0, provided e has not added or removed any characters from the motto in the past 7 days.

}

Votes:

• Wotton: FOR
• Trigon: FOR, seems like a fun subgame.